8400 - 8599
As the species creates itself and its future, the prediction scientist must gain knowledge of the species as a whole ... that is, of all the viewpoints of the species ... of the integral species-viewpoint. Only then is he able to predict the future accurately.
Mental concepts (that is, mental monads) are an omnipresent agency of the Absolute. They tend to be conflictive but, as a genus, they are the means by which the whole of existence is created and commanded.
Successful democracy tacitly allows for the de facto operation of 'the committee of one' principle: It allows its capable leaders a fairly loose rein.
A theoretical science is initiated when relevant knowledge is gathered in a system of interrelated propositions. This present propositional network constitutes the beginnings of a theoretical science of prediction.
Some say that a science is about facts which can be proven but philosophers of science question whether incontrovertible proof is possible. I believe that a science may be defined as an interrelated series of propositions which works as an effective tool in a particular area of interest or endeavour.
Now that this propositional network is at a stage when it can be effectively used, together with current events, as a device for predicting the future, the question arises as to the adequacy of current events data which is presently available to the predictor. How comprehensive and how detailed must our current events data be?
We must be careful not to be so immersed in detail that we lose out on matters of insight, intuition and overview. Prediction science must have a strongly macrocosmic emphasis if it is to succeed. In order to be successful predictors, we must identify the underlying causes and essential characteristics of existence.
The mind changes its environment, to accord with what it wants to feed on.
Our environment is our feed-stock, and it changes to accord with the feeding needs, choices and patterns of our species.
The sub-conscious mind of the species is of transfinite nature. The species-will, which operates at this level, is of transfinite nature.
The conscious will of the species is perceived and expressed in terms of finite time and finite space, but the subconscious will of the species is transfinite and is unconstrained by finity.
As the operative will of our species is sub-conscious and transfinite, the primary task of a prediction scientist is to empathise with the transfinite species-will.
As the species-will operates transfinitely, prediction scientists must be able to communicate at the transfinite level: They must be able to understand the species-will.
Knowledge, which is transfinite, is accessed transfinitely by the species' sub-conscious mind, and is accessed by every individual member of the species, at the subconscious level.
Increases of specie5-knowledge influence the behaviour of all species-members, at the sub-conscious level.
Increasing insightful knowledge, fed into the species, subconscious mind, is the major determinant of changing behavioural patterns.
Species-wide subconscious communication of knowledge is immediate and effective.
To control the mind is to control mental monads ... beings which are extraordinarily obedient and conformable to one's will ... like an army or raw recruits, ready to be trained into a powerful army of enthusiastic volunteers.
Creativity cannot be limited or preknown finitely, but it can be lived and experienced transfinitely and timelessly.
There can be no beginning of creation. That, which is perceived as a beginning, is a transformation or a changing but uninterrupted phase of the eternal processes of expression.
To perceive that a thing has a beginning is to perceive in terms of a time dimension ... but the quality of creativity has no time dimension, for it is transfinite. Although creativity expresses finitely, it is itself transfinite.
Expression is an infinite changing series. There is no beginning: There is always prior expression.
It is a nonsense to say that the future is fixed and that it has already been created in the transfinite. The transfinite is a dynamic 'ever-now': It is not limited in any way, and it contains no unalterable future scenarios.
Knowledge of the future telescopes the future.
When knowledge of the future is accessed by an individual mind, it is thereby accessed by the species-mind.
As the species becomes aware of its transfinity, its need for finite expression diminishes and its knowledge of its physical future increases and its physical remainder-time diminishes.
As the species becomes more aware of its transfinity, it lives more in transfinite mode and less in finite mode.
Indications as to the future, suggested by one proposition or by a selection of propositions, should only be provisional and subject to the indications of the network as a whole. The network is a reliable tool of prediction only when used as a whole and not when used piecemeal.
There is a quantum leap from the knowledge of reasoning-intellect to the knowledge of intuitive-intellect. From the domain of the latter, the former seems very restricted, unnecessarily complicated, materialistic, low-vibed, and biased.
The only thing to fear about the unknown is fear of the unknown.
As the species has the power to convert unknown to known, and as each of us is one with the species, we have nothing to fear from the unknown: Our species is master of the known and master of the unknown.
According to the state of our consciousness, we live as transfinite beings or as finite beings. We live according to what we are conscious of. To live now, transfinitely, requires only that we be consciously aware that we are transfinite beings.
We select our data; we think-gather incoming raw data into facts; we construct our facts; we ideate our facts; we create our facts. Science is a creative endeavour.
There is no difference between an applied philosophy and an applied science: Both are instrumentalist and pragmatic. This prediction network and system may be perceived as either a work of applied philosophy or a work of applied science.
Communicators often assume that news is generally unknown until it is published by the news media. On the contrary, the public receive as news what they already subconsciously know to be true: They feel it 'in their bones', so to say. It is because of this species' pre-awareness that the public accepts news accounts to be true.
Journalists articulate what the public already knows intuitively and instinctively. It is by reason of this species' pre-awareness that the public will accept some items of news and reject or discount other items. Common sense is largely based on intuitions and instincts of species' pre-awareness.
A good journalist knows what the public knows 'in its bones', and articulates it faithfully. A predictor does the same and, in this respect, predictors and journalists have quite a lot in common. A predictor's skills include predictive journalism.
The major pragmatic criterion of any proposition is its adequacy to verifiable prediction. The most useful of propositions contribute, directly or indirectly, to the making of predictions which can be verified in experience.
That theoretical nucleonic propositions have produced significant practical outcomes, is indicative of the creative potential of the genus of theoretical propositions: No limits can be assigned to this potential.
The truth of a proposition, the compelling character of the evidence, or the rationality of a method, never explains the acceptance of a discovery.
Regardless of evidence etc., some propositions are accepted, rejected, or put on 'the back-burner', and brought forward for acceptance at a future time. In relation to acceptance, each proposition has its appropriate timing. Some, of course, may be just too unpalatable for public acceptance.
It cannot be said that a proposition based on facts is more scientific than a proposition based on theory, when both propositions are shown to work in practice.
Demonstrated actual outcomes and their propositional precursors, are scientific, regardless of methodology, or lack of it! Anything goes, as long as it works!
This network is like a navigator's rutter, in that it includes bearings, navigational points, clues and miscellaneous notes which assist in finding and mapping the future: In particular, the network includes ...
(Note: No attempt has been made, or should be made, to categorise or classify the above lines of thought).
- Physical, geophysical and geological vectors.
- Biological and evolutionary vectors.
- Sociological and behavioural vectors, and psycho-socio phenomena.
- Political phenomena.
- Economic and financial phenomena.
- Meteorological and climatic phenomena.
- Geometrical shapes of relevant variables.
- Findings of chaos science.
- Statistics and statistical projections.
- Probability assessments, of various future scenarios.
- Characteristics of singularity.
- Absoluteness, and its implications.
- Transfinity and transfinite categories.
- Interconnection and interlinkaqe.
- Energy, as bearer of quality.
- Qualitative functional relationships.
- Instrumentalism and pragmatism.
- Lines of reasoning, and their limitations.
- Conceptual models, and their limitations.
- Ideative and conceptual triggers.
- Propensities and potentials.
- Imperatives of existence.
- Exponential and reciprocal relationships, relevant to future.
- Mathematical summations and resolutions.
- The nature of perception, including gestalt and gene-coded programming.
- The philosophies of over eighty leading philosophers.
- Implications of the multi-paradigmatic approach.
- Timing and queueing.
- The philosophy of quality.
- Cohesion, and its implications.
- The species as principal ... and species-will.
- Creative intelligence, and creativity.
- Intuition, 'vibes', 'feel', and instinct.
- Intellectual insight.
- The characteristics of void.
- Metamorphosis of the species.
- Holism as essential to prediction.
- Strategic concepts and ploys.
- Paradox, as means of insight.
- The philosophy of meaning.
- Ethics, and moral philosophy.
- Religious beliefs and concepts.
- The philosophy and psychology of motivation.
- Absolute logic, as distinct from formal logic.
- Fallacious reasoning, as cloaking device.
- Propositions, as a quasi-bio genus.
- The philosophy of science.
- Art, as relevant to prediction.
- Entropy, and its general implications.
- The future, as the transfinite now.
- The nature of prehension, and prehensive progression.
- Information, communications and journalism.
- The making of predictions, and the predictor's skills.
- Ploy-finding and ploy-making.
Any attempt to categorise lines of thought seeks to impose old constraints upon current and future thinking.
As global volcanic activity increases, the enhanced aerosol/dust stratospheric de-insolation layer warms the uppermost layers of the stratosphere and reduces the movement of warm air from low to high altitudes. This tends to raise equatorial surface temperatures and enhances the N-SIS-N flows of equatorial air to higher latitudes, resulting in greater uniformity of temperatures latitudinally. The rise of Antarctic winter temperatures, due to the ozone hole, also causes increased S-N airflows and greater uniformity of temperatures latitudinally. Changes of climatic conditions are most marked in the mid latitudes. All of these effects, and the El Niño phenomenon, are due to increased global volcanism.
Electromagnetic technology is radically altering the milieu of human perception ... that is, the reality coordinates within which we apprehend and order sense data. Experience now presents itself in 'fields' of simultaneous interaction.
The way people communicate is more important than what they communicate: The medium is the most significant message.
Electronic circuitry has overthrown the regime of time and space: Its message is one of total change.
Statisticians have a great deal to present about people in general, as abstract enumerations, but very little to present about people, as people, and nothing about individuals.
Statistics are mental abstractions which are only indirectly and approximately indicative of human experience ... and yet statistics are often elevated to the status of unqualified reality.
When statisticians select and publicise certain indices (of GNP, inflation, etc.) they are involved in a process of selective reality: They are according greater reality to certain aspects of our life than to other aspects.
When one has a problem and is 'stumped' for a solution, there is always a ploy ... and it is a matter of finding it or inventing it. Problems do not lack solutions: They are presented to us as challenges and promptings of our creative powers and ingenuity.
How to discover the future is a problem, and we may be assured that ploys may be found or invented to solve the problem.
Fallacious reasoning cloaks or obscures concepts and possible courses of action, and is often a means by which we consciously or subconsciously avoid consequences which we desire to avoid but cannot otherwise avoid.
We are transfinite beings and we create our own future transfinitely.
It is strange that many think of themselves as finite beings, for all of our qualities are transfinite. Our qualities of personality, intuition, instinct, awareness, will, intelligence, creativity, courage, interest, love, determination, resourcefulness, initiative, faith, morality, beauty, justice, humour, happiness, and so on ... these are all transfinite, unquantifiable and unenumerable qualities.
Why would we think of our essential individual being as finite? ... for all our qualities are transfinite ... and why should our individuality not also be transfinite? It is common-sense reality that we are transfinite individuals.
There are no physical brain thought-processes in the transfinite life: There is intuition, awareness, sensitivity to vibes, recognition and remembrance ... but no processes of reasoning. All, that was intellectual in worldly life, is intuitive in transfinite life.
Much can be said about the transfinite life: It is a life of sensitivity, of subtle emotions, of light, of colour, of form, of movement, of beauty, and of like and dislike ... of attraction and repulsion. It is essentially a qualitative life: All the qualities are experienced there, to a heightened degree. Happiness, enjoyment, friendship and warm companionship are there ... and activities are according to choice and personal needs.
Transfinite life is vibe-life and vibes have different frequency levels, from low-gross to high-fine. The vibes pertain to an ascending power series, described by Cantor as aleph-plus categories.
The greatest achievement is to emerge from the tangled jungle of thought to the clear field of intuition.
In order to maximise our species' survival potential, we need to retain maximum flexibility: In terms of thought processes, we need to be able to 'rationalise' any course of action or belief which may be requisite to species' survival, and thus we have the capability to convince ourselves of the rightness of any course of action and of any belief whatsoever. We are woolly but pragmatic thinkers, by survival necessity: We are subconsciously aware that the actualities of an as yet unknown future are not accessible to current logical reasoning.
Most propositions, like Rorschach blots, have meanings which change according to the perception of individuals ... and even momentarily, from time to time.
Some propositions seem to be unchanging, but usually this is not so. Those, who seek certainty, tend to impute certainty where certainty is unwarranted.
To the extent that particular propositions are held to be certain, the uncertainty of other propositions increases: This is Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, as applied to propositional theory.
The theory of nuclear physics, known as Heisenberg's principle of uncertainty, applies to the perception of all phenomena, and constitutes the basis of a philosophy of selective reality.
Our foci of attention are our realities.
To increase the level of certainty of any thing is to decrease the level of certainty of all other things.
To focus attention on any thing increases our certainty about that thing and decreases our certainty about all other things.
To increase our perception of a thing is to increase the reality of that thing.
When more public attention is focused on a particular thing, attention is withheld or diverted from other things.
When more attention is focused on a particular thing, that thing becomes more real than it was prior to the commencement of focus enhancement.
To espouse one viewpoint as the truth devalues all other viewpoints of the truth.
As truth is many-faceted and as concentration on the truth of one facet reduces the truth-status of other facets, truth is maximised by concentrating on many facets of truth at the same time: This is a rationale of propositional networking.
The most reliable and valuable aspect of this network, in the making of predictions, does not rest in particular propositions but in the quintessence of the whole. The predictor must be fully acquainted with the whole network and, with its quintessence in mind, the predictor intellectually intuits the present-to-future flow of events.
The express mention of a thing tends to exclude and devalue all things which are not expressly mentioned.
The express mention of one person tends to exclude and devalue all persons who are not expressly mentioned.
In legal interpretation, that which is expressed causes that which is silent to cease.
Our realities depend on the intensity, focus and duration of our attention and perception.
The more data we have, the greater our distraction and the less the intensity and duration of our focus of attention on particular data ... and the reality characteristic of data generally diminishes.
The more data we have, the more diffused our realities become.
The more data we have, the greater our uncertainty and confusion.
Making decisions on present data will be like walking on thin ice, for decision-makers will not know what effect proliferating future data will have.
In this nuclear age, we are fast realising that the power and potential of the creative intelligence is of a higher order than any physical power.
We are inclined to think that we are collecting more and more physical data, whereas most of our new data is mental data. We are gradually coming to the realisation that all things are essentially mental.
Mental data constitute a separate living species which multiplies at an exponential rate.
Propositions, of the same provenance, permit of only limited extension.
Common-provenance reasoning quickly loses validity when extended.
For maximum validity, a chain of reasoning should have as few component links of common provenance as possible.
The validity, of an over-extended chain of reasoning of common provenance, will collapse unless it is 'buttressed' by supportive chains of reasoning of different provenance.
A propositional chain of common provenance, may be greatly strengthened by propositions of a different ideative strain.
Other things equal, network reasoning (based on propositions of varied provenance) is more reliable than reasoning based on common provenance ... and this is particularly true in relation to prediction.
Decisions, which are justified by processes of reasoning, may be unjust. Court judgements, which are based on processes of reasoning, may be unjust.
The more the public focuses on the fictions of TV and video, the more real such fictions become ... and the less real the non-fictional world becomes ... and the meaning and value of reality generally decreases. Real fiction, fictive reality, and non-fictive reality become almost indistinguishable shades of grey.
To direct attention is to direct response. By raising the level of attention to selected stimuli, communications media have enormous power to control and direct responses to stimuli.
Scarcity of supply of a thing, relative to demand for a thing, determines the value of a thing.
To publicise a thing is to increase the demand for and value of a thing.
The more available data, the more confused a society becomes and the more readily it responds to leaders who are able to focus their attention and motivate them.
Before a political general election, we may expect more uncertainty and more undecided voters ... and well-funded and well-directed party promotional campaigns may be most effective at this time, and more so than prior to past elections.
To publicise a person is to increase attention and interest in that person, thus increasing the value of that person.
To contribute money to publicising a person is to increase the value and reality of that person. In such a case, it may be said that value and reality are passing from the donor to the person publicised ... and, often, the value and reality of the donor also increases.
Money comprehends and objectifies the real.
Increased wealth and increased purchasing power equate increased reality.
All characteristics of light, including light-speed, are imputations of perception ... that is, they are relative to perception, and functions of perception.
The speed of light is constant simply because we perceive it so.
The realities of time, space and motion are relative to perception: All phenomena are relative to perception: All realities are relative to perception: There is no reality independent of perception.
Perception changes over time, and reality changes over time.
That, which is perceived by a species, is the reality of that species.
Only that which is perceived is real.
The way an individual perceives things is that individual's reality.
Perception equates reality and value.
That, which is not perceived, has no value.
The duration and intensity of perception is the measure of value.
That, which is obvious, receives less attention and becomes less real and less valuable ... and, when a thing is taken for granted, it becomes less real and less valuable.
That, which changes or directs perception, changes or directs reality and value.
Controllers of communications are able to change or direct realities and values.
The level of interest in a person is the measure of that person's reality and value.
When a person becomes more interesting to others, that person becomes more interesting to himself/herself.
When a person becomes more interesting to others, that person becomes more valuable to others ... and becomes more valuable to himself/herself.
Boredom equates lack of interest and lack of value and lack of reality.
An environment which bores an individual has no interest, no value and no reality to that individual.
Is there any reality, other than that of our species? Our reality is the gene-encoded perception of our species: There is no evidence that it is anything other than this. Our species is our society ... and there is no reality other than societal reality.
Value is a societal concept, and there is no value other than societal value.
Concepts of value and reality are societal concepts which have no meaning or application beyond their societal provenance.
Interest varies from individual to individual, but it is always essentially societal.
Under any circumstances, an attack on another person's viewpoint is an act of aggression against that person.
To support another person's viewpoint is to constitute oneself as an ally of that person.
To be an ally of another person is tantamount to supporting that person's viewpoint or viewpoints.
To devalue a thing is to reduce the reality of that thing.
To ignore a person is to reduce the value and reality of that person.
News publishers, editors and journalists are creators of value and reality.
To disagree with another person's viewpoint is to devalue and devalidate that other person.
A person's viewpoint is essential to and central to that person.
A person's mana is a person's value and reality. To believe in or agree with or support a person, is to add to the mana of that person and, thereby, to add to that person's value and reality.
Now that the mental aspect of data has become independent of physical phenomena, mental data is proliferating exponentially.
Mental concepts are no longer confined to what is: The mind now creates that which did not previously exist. There is now no limitation whatsoever on mental concepts and mental data.
At large and no longer tied physically, the creative intelligence is really exercising its powers and revelling in its freedom.
Reality is what we perceive it to be; the reality of the future is what we perceive it to be; the future is what we perceive it to be.
We tend to perceive what we are looking for.
We tend to perceive the future which we are looking for.
The future, which our species expects, is the future which our species actually experiences.
The future is entirely the creation of our species: The future is created transfinitely and all minds are one in the creation of it.
The future is created transfinitely, in the Aleph-plus Cantor power categories, wherein each ascending power comprehends all lesser powers ... that is, comprehends all subsets.
All individuals participate in the creation of the future ... and they participate according to their awareness of the ascending transfinite power categories: Their influence depends upon the power-level to which their awareness extends.
Focused attention is like a fulcrum ... and information is used to apply leverage against this fulcrum, in order to enhance reality.
In mechanics, leverage enhances force: In communications, information enhances reality.
As well as saying 'give me a fulcrum and I will move the world', one may also say 'give me a focus of attention and I will change reality'.
A focus of attention needs to be motivationally linked to survival ... and to involve such aspects as safety, security, living standards, and procreation.
To focus attention is to create reality.
Advertising, and other promotional activities, focus attention and create reality.
Teachers, by focusing the attention of their students, create the realities of their students.
By focusing their attention, a leader creates the realities of his/her followers.
The fulcrum or key aspect of leadership and motivation is the focusing of attention.
In order to motivate a person, it is necessary to focus that person's attention on a desirable outcome and on the means whereby that outcome is attainable. Successful motivation creatively enhances a person's reality.
Microscopes and telescopes assist in the focusing of attention and in the creation of reality.
As we can rationalise any belief and accord it the status of truth, we mix and choose our 'truth-cocktail' according to taste.
As an absolute quality, truth is at once many-faceted, differentiative, integrative, tautological, and creative.
Each individual viewpoint is a facet of the truth ... and individuality differentiates the truth.
The absolute oneness and transfinity of truth is integrative.
To describe one aspect of truth is to describe the whole truth and each other aspect of truth ... and thus truth is tautological, for we describe it in terms of itself.
We create what we know in the process of knowing ... and what we know is our reality and our truth: To know the truth is to create the truth.
A person's reality is a person's truth.
The spirit of truth is the quintessence of all knowledge and understanding.
The truth is simple ... for all is the Absolute God, which is wholly in each and every thing and, by the first commandment, we are to worship none other. We should see God in all things, and our mind should think of none other. When we see and think of any particular thing, we should see and think of God as that thing ... and, living thus, we live in the heaven of God's Kingdom ... and, living thus, we will know the simplicity of Absolute truth.
When we see or think of a particular thing as being other than God, we alienate that thing from God and we alienate ourselves along with it. When we say something is evil, we not only judge it but we also judge ourselves ... and we not only alienate it by judgement but also ourselves by judgement. To the pure, all is pure ... and, to the godly, all is God.
It has been said that whatever one undertakes to do, one should do it thoroughly, or one should nor undertake it at all.
Genes are essentially cohesive: They are a major means whereby differentiations are maintained over time ... that is, a major means by which individual differences are vested with continuity and duration.
Accurate measurement of an observable quantity necessarily produces uncertainties in one's knowledge of the values of other observables.
To increase our perception of a thing is to increase our certainty of that thing and to increase the reality of that thing. Perception, certainty and reality are implicatively, integrally and functionally related.
Increased duration/intensity/focus of perception increases certainty about, and reality of, that which is perceived.
Associated trauma (along with intensity, focus and duration) increases the reality of perception and experience.
That, upon which a species focuses its attention, is the reality of that species.
An individual and the species perceive and create their reality at the one and same time.
An individual's reality is a function of its 'key-in' to species reality.
Present reality and future reality are functionally related.
As present reality and future reality are functionally related, a predictor is 'homing-in' on the future when he 'homes-in' on species' present reality.
As individuals, we are DNA programmed with simple perception codes. We are not programmed so that each and every human perceives the same things. The design is such that we each see things differently, and hear, taste, feel, smell things differently.
Each individual creates sense-images by building from simple base DNA codes, in a uniquely individual way.
The species' perception mechanism may be thought of as a means whereby species gestalt-whole images are held in a species memory bank, which is accessed by individuals via their simple DNA codes. These codes act as attractors to whole species images.
In the process of perception, our DNA coding acts as attractor to species' gestalt-whole images, but in such manner that individuals may influence image formation in a uniquely individual way.
Creative individuals have a greater influence over the image formation processes of perception ... and successful adaptations are fed back into DNA via RNA.
The process of attractor recall, by which we use our DNA codes to access species image wholes, is preemptive: It blocks out all other incoming perception stimuli. One can't listen to two conversations or concentrate on two sets of sense signals at the same time. One must focus one's attention in order to access the species' image banks.
Although we perceive what our DNA codes predispose or programme us to perceive, we have the individual capability to opt out of or modify standard species' images. We may use our creative abilities to create any images we desire.
The act of focusing our attention not only enables us to access species' images, it concentrates our creative abilities ... and we may opt to copy, alter or replace species' images.
When we call on the memory bank of species' images, we automatically select from a series of paradigms ... that is, from a series of alternative or competing images or concepts. However, we also have the capability to create new paradigms.
Claims on our attention are queued-up and await their turn, so to say.
Only things which claim our attention have reality for us.
Things and activities, on which we focus our attention, are our reality.
We may select or invent our own realities, or we may have realities thrust upon us.
Those, who master their environment, select or invent their realities: Those who don't have their realities imposed upon them.
Sustained focused attention equates reality, and the reality of my predictions is the measure of sustained focused public attention achieved by my predictions.
As the intensity and duration of focused attention equates reality and value, the redirection of attention equates the redirection of reality and value.
Those who are able to redirect attention, and thereby redirect reality and value, are able to profit thereby.
Focused attention, like money, equates value and reality.
News publishers gain circulation and profits by shifts of attention, in a similar way to speculators who gain profits by shifts of currency.
The world may end tomorrow, but we live in anticipation of another and different future. In so far as our anticipations affect our present actions, we live our future now.
Our present is either enlarged or restricted by our anticipations as to the future.
The character and nature of our present lives is to a great extent influenced by our anticipations as to the future.
Believed prediction5 influence the character and nature of our present lives.